Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lyons v. City of Ada, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Natosha T. Lyons
Defendant:
The City of Ada, Oklahoma, Tyler W. Pogue, Ryan C. Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciempa v. Del City City of et al
as 5:2018cv00955
Defendant:
Ken Bartlett, Pam Finch, Del City City of and others
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Ciempa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma , Department of Corrections , Oklahoma City City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hinkle et al v. Beckham County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2015cv00497
Plaintiff:
Laramie Sterling Hinkle and Jarrod Hinkle
Defendant:
Beckham County Board of County Commissioners, Scott Jay, Strider Estep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunivan v. Dowling et al
as 5:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dunivan
Defendant:
Janet Dowling, Robert Patton, Kenneth Edward Tate, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Chow et al
as 5:2014cv01057
Plaintiff:
Clovis L Prince and Unnamed Minors
Defendant:
Michelle H Chow , Larry Alan Levick , Todd Alan Hoodenpyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Defendant A et al
as 4:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Defendant A , Defendant B , Defendant C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fields v. Rayl et al
as 4:2009cv00800
Plaintiff:
James Fields, Jr
Defendant:
James Brian Rayl, Pete Silva, Tulsa Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
