Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00689
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00106
Plaintiff: Dan Allen, Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee
Defendant: The City of Evergreen, Alabama, Pete Wolff, III, Luther Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00107
Plaintiff: Dan Allen , Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee
Defendant: The City of Evergreen, Alabama , Pete Wolff, III , Luther Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00496
Plaintiff: Dan Allen , Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee
Defendant: The City of Evergreen, Alabama , Pete Wolff, III , Luther Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Kilbride v. United States Government et al
as 4:2008cv00962
Plaintiff: Thomas Charles Kilbride
Defendant: United States Government, United States Treasury Department, National Finance Center and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00608
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kilbride v. The United States Government et al
as 4:2008cv00552
Plaintiff: Thomas Charles Kilbride
Defendant: The United States Government, Commissioner, United States Treasury Department, Director National Finance Center and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00772
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?