Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gayle v. Benton Harbor Area Schools et al
as 1:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Gayle
Defendant:
Benton Harbor Area Schools, Benton Harbor Area Schools Board of Education, Kelvin Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rubicon Real Estate Holdings, LLC et al v. Pontiac, City of et al
as 2:2023cv10439
Plaintiff:
Rubicon Real Estate Holdings, LLC, Browne Design Consultants, LLC and Joseph Brown
Defendant:
Pontiac, City of and Garland S Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. McCabe et al
as 2:2023cv10398
Plaintiff:
Jaden Thomas
Defendant:
Cody McCabe and Edward Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crippen v. Midland, City of et al
as 1:2014cv10699
Defendant:
Midland, City of , Jeffrey A Doyle and Gerald Ladwig
Plaintiff:
Kristie Crippen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Sorenson Communications, Inc
as 1:2011cv00222
Defendant:
Sorenson Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Doyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. Grand Rapids Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv00586
Plaintiff:
Tyrosh Brown
Defendant:
Grand Rapids Police Department, Unknown Parties, Kenton Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buda v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2009cv00693
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Buda
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MTU Care Facility, Eglar Reception Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Pierson et al v. Findlay et al
as 1:2007cv11812
Plaintiff:
Dimetrice Pierson, D. C., Doria Coston and others
Defendant:
Laura Findlay, Clarence Newton, Theresa Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Thompson et al v. Flint, City of et al
as 4:2007cv11107
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Thompson, Jennifer Thompson, Jennifer Thompson and others
Defendant:
Flint, City of, Gary Hagler, Gary Hagler and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
