Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cyrus v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv04115
Plaintiff:
Odette K. Oliver Cyrus
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Mr. Duane Baldwin, Mr. Douglas Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain et al v. Rosado et al
as 1:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Medgine Sarah Jean and Brandako, Inc.
Defendant:
Rossana Rosado, Emanuel Cleaver, Sam Grawes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruno v. Conroy et al
as 1:2021cv02987
Defendant:
Donalda Gillies and John T. Conroy
Plaintiff:
Michael Bruno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Brown v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2017cv02508
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Brown
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Edwin Espinal, Ryan Gillis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. OVC Agency et al
as 1:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cunningham
Defendant:
OVC Agency, Rafael A. Madan, John W. Gillis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoom v. Gidney et al
as 1:2015cv04628
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoom
Defendant:
Greg Gidney, Damon Gidney, Greg Gurrier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02140
Defendant:
Police Officer Andrew Babajko, City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Mark Gillis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
