Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv22766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
BEY v. RAINS et al
as 1:2022cv06950
Plaintiff:
KHALID RASOUL BEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM RAINS, TASHA JIMENEZ and LAKISHA COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEANI v. N6094 JIMENEZ et al
as 2:2022cv05165
Plaintiff:
GREGORY IFESINACHI EZEANI
Defendant:
N6094 JIMENEZ, JANNELLE MALONEY, MARK RAMOTOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIM v. RIDGEFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
SARAH H. KIM and H. SARAH KIM
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, ANTHONY R SUAREZ, RUSSELL CASTELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv01679
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, ANTHONY R SUAREZ, Russell Castelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
MALINCONICO v. ALESSIO et al
as 2:2021cv20117
Plaintiff:
DOMENIC MALINCONICO
Defendant:
ROBERT ALESSIO, ANDY JIMENEZ, ROBERT HERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
JOA v. WEST NEW YORK TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2021cv01614
Plaintiff:
DANTE JOA
Defendant:
John Does B 1-10, P.O. Andres Osvaldo Garcia, The Police Department of West New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. JIMENEZ et al
as 2:2019cv16700
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROSARIO
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-30, CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JESSICA DEJESUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. Jimenez et al
as 2:2019cv16693
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROSARIO
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-30, CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer Jessica DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
