Cases 1 - 10 of 10
C.L.G et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2023cv05553
Plaintiff:
C.L.G and C.N.G.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services and Kerry Register
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamble v. Williamsburg County School District et al
as 4:2018cv02457
Defendant:
Kerry Singleton, Williamsburg County School District, Alfred Darby and others
Plaintiff:
La Dine Gamble and La-Dine' Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2013cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Morgan et al v. Town of Central et al
as 8:2011cv02192
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Morgan and Mary Morgan
Defendant:
Town of Central , Phillip Mishoe and Kerry Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lail et al v. United States of America, The et al
as 3:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lail, James B Spencer, Irene Santacroce and others
Defendant:
United States of America, The, N John Benson, Phil Celestini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 3:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kerry Johnson
Defendant:
Louise Cooper and Sally Mintz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Odom v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2007cv00343
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Jon Ozmint, Mary Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
