Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Pierce v. Wickenburg, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Leandra Pierce
Defendant:
Wickenburg, City of, Wickenburg Municipal Court, Wickenburg, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. New Hampshire Department of Children Youth and Families et al
as 2:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Leandra Pierce
Defendant:
New Hampshire Department of Children Youth and Families, Bow Police Department, 6th Circuit Court of New Hampshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Leandra Pierce
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court and Joseph Kiefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Bargatos
as 2:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Leandra Pierce
Defendant:
Steven Bargatos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pondexter v. Murrieta et al
as 2:2020cv02124
Defendant:
Abdiel Murrieta, Charles W Scharf, Ashley Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
April Diane Pondexter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waln et al v. Dysart School District et al
as 2:2020cv00799
Defendant:
Valley Vista High School, Traci Sawyer-Sinkbeil, Dysart School District and others
Plaintiff:
Larissa Waln and Bryan Waln
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pierce v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2018cv03907
Plaintiff:
Sherry Pierce
Defendant:
David Claridge and Tempe, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Ducey et al
as 2:2016cv01538
Plaintiff:
Michael Pierce
Defendant:
Douglas A Ducey, Michelle Regan, David M McGowan, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Arizona Event Center et al
as 2:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Martel Pierce
Defendant:
Arizona Event Center, Pro-Tec Security and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
