Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Elburki v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2024cv03039
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Ken McClure, City Clerk Anita Cotter and others
Claimant:
Mr. Kamel M. Elburki
Plaintiff:
Kamel M. Elburki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Kyle Powers, et al
as 6:2020cv03248
Plaintiff:
Michelle Carr
Defendant:
John Doe, Kyle Powers and Springfield Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Brad Cole, et al
as 6:2019cv03437
Plaintiff:
Nathan Edward Powers
Defendant:
Phillip Weathers, Brad Cole, Deputy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powers v. State of Missouri Department of Corrections/Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 6:2019cv03349
Plaintiff:
Nathan E. Powers
Defendant:
Travis Fleetwood and State of Missouri Department of Corrections/Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Cole et al
as 6:2019cv03350
Plaintiff:
Nathan Edward Powers
Defendant:
Christian County Sheriff Department, Sheriff Brad Cole and Christian County Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
