Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
TACCINO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv03115
Plaintiff:
VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA, WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS et al
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS, JERRY JACKSON, BURR ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ADAMS v. HEAD et al
as 1:2021cv02670
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. JEFF. CO. ATTY'S OFFICE
as 1:2021cv01987
Plaintiff:
JERRY E. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
JEFF. CO. ATTY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. JEFF. CO. ATTY'S OFFICE
as 1:2020cv03168
Defendant:
JEFF. CO. ATTY'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
JERRY E. ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RINDAHL v. ROBERTSON et al
as 1:2019cv03322
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE UNKOWN AGENTS, JACQUELINE ROBERTSON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE RINDAHL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ROBERTSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv01188
Plaintiff:
TRACIE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and CATHY LANIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
