Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Miller v. Hurtt et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Tonia Miller
Defendant:
Timothy Hurtt, Robert Peck, Russell Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Mixon et al v. Dearborn Heights, City of, et al
as 4:2024cv10578
Plaintiff:
Shacorra Mixon, AS 2 and AS 1
Defendant:
City of Dearborn Heights, Michael Guzowski, Tim Ciochon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexa et al v. Ann Arbor, City of
as 2:2022cv13073
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Alexa, Brandon Boggs, Jeff Malone and others
Defendant:
City of Ann Arbor and Ann Arbor, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taylor v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Emmett Taylor
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Jason McCullough, Tim Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. County of Calhoun et al
as 4:2022cv11928
Plaintiff:
Emmett Taylor
Defendant:
County of Calhoun, Conservation Officer Jason McCullough, Sgt. Tim Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pitt et al v. Lee, Township of et al
as 1:2020cv13021
Plaintiff:
Heidi Pitt and Alan Angry
Defendant:
Lee, Township of and Tim Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipman v. Russell et al
as 1:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Unknown Elsworth, Kathryn Russell, Barry County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael Shipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
