Cases 1 - 10 of 28
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant:
Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MARTINEZ v. MCCORMICK
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE RICHARD E. MCCORMICK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CASTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv03827
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEPHEN SCHWARZMAN, JONATHAN GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2021cv00299
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, SGT. CHRISTOPHER MCCORMICK and OFC. BRANDON MCCORMICK
Plaintiff:
Mary Bair and Dion Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRENTLEY v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2020cv00489
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, WILLIAM PEDUTO, TYRONE CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
MARK BRANTLEY, SR. and MARK BRENTLEY, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
