Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Taylor v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Rahn Taylor
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Evelyn Hudson, Jessica Tippett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpole v. Pike County, Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shainey Harpole
Defendant:
Pike County, Missouri, Pike County Missouri Sheriff's Office, Stephen Korte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skibo v. Dodson
as 6:2023cv03355
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryan Skibo
Defendant:
Lt. Tyler Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hayes v. Marshall Police Department
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Fred Hayes
Defendant:
Marshall Police Department, Nicolas Perez, Michael Bohannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
