Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Hillman v. Gill et al.
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Hillman
Defendant:
Joseph N. Gill, Tayler Glass, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(Junior) et al v. Canton City School District et al
as 5:2021cv02423
Defendant:
Marcus Wattley, Canton City School District, Canton City School District Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
K.W. (Junior), K.W. (Senior) and L. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McIntyre v. Pardon et al
as 1:2021cv01685
Plaintiff:
Vashon Renee McIntyre
Defendant:
Bret Hubert Pardon, Geraldine Pardon, Taylor Pardon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leech v. Management and Training Corp. et al
as 3:2021cv00086
Defendant:
Management and Training Corp., Tyler Stuckey, John Stein and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Leech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Miller v. The City of Springfield Police Division et al
as 3:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Michelle Pamer, John Doe, The Springfield Regional Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
