Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Butler v. Richmond City Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Ze'Nya Y. Butler
Defendant:
Richmond City Police Department, Richmond City Police Internal Affairs and The Office of Richmond City Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstead v. Anthem/ Elevance Health HR
as 3:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Michelle Y. Armstead
Defendant:
Anthem/ Elevance Health HR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. Twin County Regional Healthcare et al
as 7:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Smith
Defendant:
Twin County Regional Healthcare, Four Unnamed Doctors and Nurses of Twin County Regional Healthcare, Karl R. Hade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
BURTON v. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00526
Defendant:
Susanna P. Diller, Kelli Bailey, Juliana D. Martins and others
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Howard Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillian v. Doe et al
as 1:2019cv01269
Defendant:
Detective T.L. Hulse, (Unknown) Doe, 2nd Lt. George Davenport and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Y. McMillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00900
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
