Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Robinson v. Basemoor et al
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Tavon Basemoor, Johnathan Williams, Brandy Stocksdale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bowles v. Hersl et al
as 1:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Jamar Bowles
Defendant:
Officer DANIEL HERSL, John E. Burns, Jr., Stephen Romey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Hersl et al
as 1:2020cv02196
Defendant:
Sergeant John E. Burns, Jr., Baltimore City Police Department, Detective Daniel T. Hersl and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delavega v. Burns et al
as 1:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Savanna Dickey, Nathaniel Burns, Patrick Matteson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Delavega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fa
Niewenhous v. Burns et al
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Savanna Dickey, Nathaniel Burns, Patrick Matteson and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Niewenhous
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fa
Tate v. Hersl et al
as 1:2019cv02240
Defendant:
Dep. Police Comm. Dean Palmere, Major Ian Dombrowski, Officer Kevin Fassl and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Briant v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2018cv02614
Defendant:
Catherine Pugh, Baltimore City Police Department, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip O'Briant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd et al v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2017cv02849
Plaintiff:
Martha Boyd and Deona Styron
Defendant:
Tyler Armstrong, Kenneth Burns, Michael Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
