Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Rundquist: v. Crane et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Scott-Gregory Rundquist:
Defendant:
Sue Crane, Family Support Division, Andrew Bailey and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Shunstrom v. Cordonnier et al
as 6:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
Alison Y. Shunstrom
Defendant:
Michael J. Cordonnier and Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Brondel v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Wayne L Brondel
Defendant:
Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. The City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lamar Allan Johnson
Defendant:
The City of St. Louis, Missouri, Joseph Nickerson, Clyde Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Missouri Association of School Librarians et al v. Jean Peters Baker
as 4:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Missouri Association of School Librarians and Missouri Library Association
Defendant:
Jean Peters Baker
Intervenor Defendant:
Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chinnery v. Bailey
as 2:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Chinnery
Defendant:
Andrew T. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
