Cases 1 - 10 of 27
PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC et al v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 3:2023cv10385
Plaintiff:
PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC, SARAH BRANNEN, LINDSAY DURTSCHI and others
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and ESCAMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bass v. Brannen
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Carl William Bass
Defendant:
John Brannen and Network Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Marcure v. Chenyon
as 3:2022cv03164
Plaintiff:
Brannen Marcure
Defendant:
Chenyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brannen et al v. City of Jesup, Georgia et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Rachel Brannen, Jason LaRoche, Matthew LaRoche and others
Defendant:
City of Jesup, Georgia, Mike Lane, Ray Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brannen v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2021cv00347
Defendant:
John A Cunningham, Neville G Pinto and University Of Cincinnati
Plaintiff:
John R Brannen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brannen v. McGlamery et al
as 6:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Dustin Lanier and Kirk Mcglamery
Plaintiff:
Clinton Reagor Brannen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brannen v. Isom et al
as 1:2019cv02913
Plaintiff:
Sam Brannen
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Chris Kernahan and Eric Isom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
