Cases 1 - 10 of 322
Weddington v. Scott et al
as 1:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Weddington
Defendant:
Mayor Brandon Scott, Gov. Wes Moore and Baltimore City, Md.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
N.C. et al v. Board of Education Baltimore County et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
N. C., J. C. and Ni. C.
Defendant:
Board of Education Baltimore County, Myriam Yarbrough, Allison Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Banerjee v. Gelber et al
as 8:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee
Defendant:
Judge Rand Lewis Gelber, Admin Judge Sherri D. Koch, Judge John C. Moffett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Johnson v. Bryant et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Johnson
Defendant:
Jeffery Bryant, Marcus Henderson and Leonard Re'Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
