Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Halliburton et al v. Eades et al
as 5:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Halliburton and Leah Mari Halliburton
Defendant:
Bryan M Eades, Conner P Newman and Connor P Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Conner v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2019cv00047
Defendant:
The City of Kingston Oklahoma, Marshall County Sheriff's Department Oklahoma, Oklahoma State of and others
Plaintiff:
Charles M Conner, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00500
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Smith v. Snodgrass et al
as 6:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Randy Smith
Defendant:
Deby Snodgrass , Kris Marek , Bryce Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moody v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Shannon Nichole Moody
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Dick Conner Correctional Center and Greg Province
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Shawnee City of et al
as 5:2008cv01279
Plaintiff:
James Harrison Cook
Defendant:
Shawnee City of, Shawnee City of, Alan Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raper v. Boggs et al
as 4:2007cv00499
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Raper
Defendant:
John Boggs, Stephen Nickolas Conners and Keith Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
