Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ziadeh v. City of Knoxville (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00022
Plaintiff:
Helal Ziadeh
Defendant:
City of Knoxville, Jeff Day, Steve Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Sell et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Neal Pinkston, Chattanooga, TN Housing Authority, Andrew Basler and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonner v. National Diagnostic, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00162
Defendant:
International, C. Eric Stevens, National Diagnostic, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larkin et al v. Day et al
as 2:2018cv02636
Defendant:
Pilgrim Films & Television, L.L.C. d/b/a Pilgrim Media Group and Operations, Discovery, Inc. and Jonathan Day
Plaintiff:
Chad Larkin and Genny Larkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 3:2017cv01031
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
