Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Holloway v. City of Fort Worth, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tawayne Holloway
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth Texas and Mitchell J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. Revelstoke Venture, LLC.
as 4:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Elisha Holloway and Elisha N Holloway
Defendant:
Revelstoke Venture, LLC. and Revelstoke Venture LLC
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Holloway v. City of Fort Worth, Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Tawayne Holloway
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth, Texas and Mitchell J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cervini et al v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2021cv00565
Defendant:
Joeylynn Mesaros, Jane Does, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cervini, Timothy Holloway, Wendy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cervini et al v. Stapp et al
as 1:2021cv00568
Defendant:
Chase Stapp, Rachel Roes, Richard Roes and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cervini, Timothy Holloway, Wendy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holloway v. Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Company
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Company
Plaintiff:
Shafton Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
