Cases 1 - 10 of 743
Johnson v. Carrols Corp et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corp, Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUTORA v. FAREED et al
as 2:2024cv01923
Plaintiff:
TOLEKSIS BIIN TUTORA, SR.
Defendant:
DR. FAREED and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WENDY ARIANA SPENCE v. YEADON BOROUGH et al
as 2:2024cv01530
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WENDY ARIANA SPENCE
Defendant:
YEADON BOROUGH, ROBERT WELLBROCK, DANIELLE PETTYJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
FRANCIS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
LLOYD FRANCIS
Defendant:
AMBER TIFFANY SMITH, DELTA COMMUNITY SUPPORT, JOELLE SHANESY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
JOHNSON v. PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS et al
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
THEMA JOHNSON
Defendant:
PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS, SAMUEL SANG-BUM LEE, JIM BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
