Cases 1 - 10 of 242
Johnson v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
TeLissah R Johnson
Defendant:
MO Jackson County, Eric Lyles and Joseph Turley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Branca v. Lottinger et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Branca
Defendant:
Robert Lottinger, Steve Powell, Robert Taylor and others
Johnson-Byrd et al v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Arlene Johnson-Byrd and Louis Byrd
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garrett et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M Garrett and Paul Leroy Wickham
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Mike Johnson, Eastern District of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Johnson v. The City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lamar Allan Johnson
Defendant:
The City of St. Louis, Missouri, Joseph Nickerson, Clyde Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
