Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Enriquez v. Beeks et al
as 2:2018cv02019
Plaintiff:
Yajaira Enriquez
Defendant:
Joshua Beeks, Clint Crockett, Joseph Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis-Randolph v. Arizona Department of Child Safety et al
as 2:2016cv03158
Plaintiff:
Shirea Anita Davis-Randolph
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Child Safety, Bonnie Nicole Platter, Tamara Twellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Potter v. Villasenor et al
as 4:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Anthony Potter
Defendant:
Roberto Villasenor, Michael Ortega, Jonathan Rothschild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2015cv00420
Defendant:
Tucson, City of , Jonathan Rothschild, Paul Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Geary Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Public Integrity Alliance Incorporated et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Public Integrity Alliance Incorporated , Bruce Ash , Fernando Gonzales and others
Defendant:
Tucson, City of , Jonathan Rothschild , Regina Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guinn v. Bartlett
as 3:2011cv08174
Plaintiff:
Anthony W Guinn
Defendant:
Randolph A Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brin v. Tanner Medical Staffing LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02100
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court, Unknown Perry, Unknown Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Stella Brin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Barkclay v. Phoenix College et al
as 2:2011cv01968
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Barkclay
Defendant:
Phoenix College, Randolph Lumm, Doyle Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv08053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
