Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Garth v. Hommrich et al
as 3:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
Tracy Marie Garth , ACB and CAB
Defendant:
Bonnie Hommrich, Emily Kirby, Sara Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Franklin et al
as 3:2016cv01342
Plaintiff:
Meagan Renee Brown
Defendant:
City of Franklin , Craig Wright , Cory Kroger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elaster v. Hamilton County Department of Education et al
as 1:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
Theodore Elaster
Defendant:
Hamilton County Department of Education , Edward Rowe and Carol Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Collierville
as 2:2011cv02783
Plaintiff:
R. S. Harris
Defendant:
Town Collierville , The Town of Collierville Board of Zoning Appeals , Nasreen Aman and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
O'Barr v. Lincoln County, TN et al
as 4:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
James L. O'Barr
Defendant:
Lincoln County, TN, Murray Blackwelder, Robert A. Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
