Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thompson v. Gurule
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Frankie Elyse Gurule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward et al v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv08015
Plaintiff:
Michael P Ward, Kelli Ward and Mole Medical Services PC
Defendant:
Bennie G Thompson, Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol and T-Mobile USA Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Stuart et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01917
Plaintiff:
Mark E Stuart and Virginia G Stuart
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, WJ Lane, Unknown Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. United States Government et al
as 2:2021cv01504
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
United States Government, United States Department of Justice and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00368
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2020cv00755
Defendant:
W.J. Lane, Solange Whitehead, Unknown Millhaven and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia G Stuart and Mark E Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00632
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Heffington v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Gerald Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Heffington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
