Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FAGGIOLO v. BOROUGH OF RIDLEY PARK et al
as 2:2023cv04920
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO NICHOLAS FAGGIOLO
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RIDLEY PARK, MICHELLE PORTNOFF, ROBERT P. DADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAGGIOLO v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE et al
as 2:2023cv01904
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO NICHOLAS FAGGIOLO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE, DELAWARE COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU TAX CLAIM BUREAU, JOHN VAN ZELST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Saunders v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv01421
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Saunders
Defendant:
Alphonso Turner, John W. Lester Williams, Carl Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. MANAYUNK BREWING COMPANY
as 2:2014cv04979
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO SMITH
Defendant:
MANAYUNK BREWING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MURRY v. POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2013cv03882
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MURRY
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE and ALPHONSO JETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GASKINS v. SANTORUM et al
as 2:2008cv01499
Plaintiff:
KONOTA A. GASKINS
Defendant:
RICK SANTORUM, RANDY VULAKOVICH, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE, MANOR COMPLEX and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PRINCE v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2007cv02722
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO PRINCE
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
