Cases 1 - 10 of 20,430
Jones v. Vital & FNR Northa America, LLC
as 3:2024cv01612
Plaintiff:
Raybin I. Jones
Defendant:
Vital & FNR Northa America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Kramer v. 14716 Harvard, LLC
as 1:2024cv01608
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kramer
Defendant:
14716 Harvard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis et al v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00519
Defendant:
Adrian Miller, Thomas Mendenhall, City Of Cincinnati and others
Plaintiff:
K.L., by his next friend and mother, Yolanda Lewis, R.L., by his next friend and mother, Yolanda Lewis and Yolanda Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Dieffenbach
as 1:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Franklin
Defendant:
Roxann H Dieffenbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Quarles v. City Of Zanesville et al
as 2:2024cv03963
Defendant:
Officer J Gerhardt, Officer W. Barron, Zanesville Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry-Lee Quarles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
