Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Abdullah v. Lepinski et al
as 0:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Zakee Abdullah
Defendant:
Justin Young, Adam Lepinski and City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahmed v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2022cv00751
Plaintiff:
Muna Ahmed
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis and Minneapolis Police Officer Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ali et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02700
Defendant:
Hussen Osman and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dhulqarnayn Ahmed Billow, Hamza Ahmed Billow, Jafar Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ali et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02703
Plaintiff:
Hussen Osman, Dhulqarnayn Ahmed Billow, Hamza Ahmed Billow and others
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Hofoka et al
as 0:2019cv00886
Defendant:
Stanley Hafoka, Taylor Kuseske, Steven Routhe and others
Plaintiff:
Fontell Demann Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv02689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
