Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rudduck et al v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Brett W. Rudduck and Amanda N. Rudduck
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, Scott E. Baker, Ronald Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
McKnight v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dyrisha Renee McKnight
Defendant:
Keyerra E. Johnson, Amanda Link and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caton et al v. Salamon et al
as 1:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Amanda Caton and Patrick Caton
Defendant:
Jacob Salamon, City of Loveland, Ohio, Dennis Rahe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zimmerman v. City of Wickliffe et al
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Amanda Zimmerman
Defendant:
City of Wickliffe, David Cook, Kevin Ankuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
