Cases 1 - 10 of 16
DENNIS, JR. v. ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL. et al
as 2:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALOYSIUS DENNIS, JR.
Defendant:
ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL., JAMAUSHIREE DENNIS ESTATE ST AL., MIAH RENEE DENNIS ESTATE ET AL. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NELLOM et al v. AMBROSE et al
as 2:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM, TENISHA NELLOM, JADEN NELLOM and others
Defendant:
ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, BARBARA A. ASH, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LABONTE v. AMBROSE et al
as 2:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE and MARLA D. TORTORICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FREEMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2014cv01047
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREEMAN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, TIMENE FARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BROWN et al v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 2:2011cv06421
Plaintiff:
JANICE BROWN and MAURICE WEST
Defendant:
KEVIN M. DOUGHERTY, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, FRED FABER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ARNEAULT et al v. O'TOOLE et al
as 1:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
EDSON R. ARNEAULT and GREGORY J. RUBINO
Defendant:
KEVIN F. O'TOOLE , R. DOUGLAS SHERMAN , E. BARRY CREANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
