Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, et al
as 1:2022cv02505
Defendant:
Maryland, Grace Communion International, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and others
Plaintiff:
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC, Christina J. Bostick, C.B.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Stone et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2017cv02459
Plaintiff:
Brock Stone , Kate Cole , John Doe and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump , James Mattis , Ryan McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fletcher et al v. Lamone et al
as 8:2011cv03220
Plaintiff:
Patricia Fletcher , Trevelyn Otts , Donald M. Glover and others
Defendant:
Linda H. Lamone and Robert L. Walker
Intervenor_plaintiff:
C. James Olson , C. Paul Smith , Ronald George and others
Amicu:
Maryland State Conference of NAACP Branches , Somerset County Branch of the NAACP , American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. American Civil Liberty Union
as 1:2011cv00658
Plaintiff:
Nathan Taylor
Defendant:
American Civil Liberty Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sons of Confederate, et al v. Glendening, et al
as 1:1997cv00178
Plaintiff:
Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. , Patrick J. Griffin, III and Maryland Division of Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.,
Defendant:
Parris Glendening , David L. Winstead and Ronald L. Freeland
Movant:
American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland and American Civil Liberties Union of the National Capital Area
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
