Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Purisima v. New Jersey Transit Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv09532
Plaintiff:
Anton C. Purisima
Defendant:
New Jersey Transit Corp., Amtrack Rail Corp., People's Republic of China and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Purisima v. New Jersey Transit Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv08226
Plaintiff:
Anton C. Purisima
Defendant:
New Jersey Transit Corp., AMTRACK Train Station, Penn Train Station NYC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Amtrack Railroad Company
as 1:2023cv08093
Plaintiff:
Jazmine Iman Roberts
Defendant:
Amtrack Railroad Company, Pete Buttigieg and Secretary of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Friedman et al
as 2:2022cv04007
Plaintiff:
Preston Lewis
Defendant:
Jhonathan Friedman, Raymond Del Valle, Troy Pichon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. EPA et al
as 3:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
EPA, Canada, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sharp v. Granite Construction et al
as 3:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Mark LH Tucker Sharp
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad, AmTrack and Granite Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRETT v. NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2020cv09033
Defendant:
SOLF & SOMPSON LAW FIRM, BARRY KNIGHT, PAUL JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwine v. Amtrack
as 1:2019cv02599
Defendant:
Amtrack
Plaintiff:
Earl Goodwine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas, Danny v. Amtrack, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Douglas
Defendant:
Amtrack, Inc., Amtrack Police, LaCrosse Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
