Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Simms v. Board of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County et al
as 5:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Kizzie Simms
Defendant:
Board of County of Commissioners for Oklahoma County, Board of Trustess for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Greg Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Patricia Anderson
Defendant:
K Williams, A Perez and City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holz v. Anderson
as 5:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Holz
Defendant:
Jesse Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Justin Walker
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Officer Justin Anderson and Justin Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blankenship et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
John Hayden Blankenship, Haylee Blankenship, Delsie Mae Pye and others
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loftis v. Tucker et al
as 6:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Embry Jay Loftis
Defendant:
Sterling Tucker and Brylun Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
