Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Robinson v. City of Shamokin, PA et al
as 4:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
City of Shamokin, PA, Northumberland County, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant:
MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CATERBONE v. OBAMA et al
as 5:2016cv04641
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
BARRACK OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caterbone v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv01751
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Caterbone
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, National Security Agency, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMEONE v. DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT et al
as 2:2016cv00505
Plaintiff:
DAVID SIMEONE
Defendant:
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, ANNIE MULLARKEY SAWA and DOUGLAS K. FRIZZELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HAAGENSEN v. WHERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
JANICE S. HAAGENSEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. WHERRY, BETTY MAY REED, EDWARD ABERSOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
