Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Armstrong et al v. Campbell County and Municipal Planning and Zoning Commission et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
David Armstrong, Jenelle Armstrong, Angela Siry and others
Defendant:
Campbell County and Municipal Planning and Zoning Commission, Chair C.J. Peters, Larry Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pfiester v. Thomas More College et al
as 2:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pfiester
Defendant:
Thomas More College, David A. Armstrong, Kathleen Jagger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Armstrong v. City of West Buechel et al
as 3:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
William Armstrong
Defendant:
City of West Buechel and Richard Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
El Bey v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Yamaktric El Bey
Defendant:
Mike Armstrong and Shelby County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wombles et al v. City of Mt. Washington, KY et al
as 3:2015cv00856
Plaintiff:
Brenton Wombles and Aaron Almon
Defendant:
City of Mt. Washington, KY and Barry S. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Officer J. Brown et al
as 3:2014cv00658
Plaintiff:
Yakie Armstrong
Defendant:
J. Brown and Shively Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ra-Bey v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2012cv00361
Plaintiff:
Nu Akk Ah Ra-Bey
Defendant:
Donald E. Armstrong, Jr., Jennifer S Ward, Gina K. Calvert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. NBC Universal Inc.
as 1:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Lorne Lynn Armstrong
Defendant:
NBC Universal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flint v. Armstrong
as 3:2009cv00878
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Flint
Defendant:
David L. Armstrong, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
