Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Johnson v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 8:2014cv04008
Plaintiff:
Jack B. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Prince George's County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Doe et al v. Sebelius et al
as 8:2009cv02197
Plaintiff:
Mary Scott Doe, National Organization for Embryonic Law (NOEL), Peter Murray and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Francis S. Collins
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe et al v. Obama et al
as 8:2009cv00755
Plaintiff:
Mary Scott Doe, National Organization for Embryonic Law (NOEL), Nightlight Christian Adoptions and others
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Charles E. Johnson and Raynard S. Kington
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilchrist et al v. HUD Housing Inspector et al
as 8:2009cv00469
Plaintiff:
Georgia L. Gilchrist
Defendant:
HUD Housing Inspector, Inspector Downing, Inspector Marylon Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Altadis USA, Inc. et al v. Prince George's County, MD et al
as 8:2008cv03492
Plaintiff:
Altadis USA, Inc., Altadis USA, Inc., John Middleton Co. and others
Defendant:
Prince George's County, MD and Jack B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pollard v. Lloyd et al
as 1:2007cv00691
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Pollard
Defendant:
Edith Lloyd, Wade Berry, William H. Thrush, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
