Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Griffin v. CFPB et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jon Antoine Griffin, Jon Antoine Jackson and Jon Griffin
Defendant:
CFPB, OCC & Bank of America, Betty Jane Griffin and others
Jones Royal v. Royal
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Betty Lee Jones Royal and Betty Lee Royal
Defendant:
Glennette Royal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
SWANIGAN et al v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, doing business as, IU HEALTH SAXONY HOSPITAL
as 1:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
RENITA SWANIGAN, SHARON DUNKLEY, BETTY ELMORE and others
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, doing business as, IU HEALTH SAXONY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRANTLEY v. UNGAR et al
as 1:2020cv02672
Defendant:
KATHLEEN TIGHE CORIDEN, BETTY ANN UNGAR and COUNTY OF BARTHOLOMEW
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP D. BRANTLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ASHLEY v. RANDOLPH COUNTY, INDIANA
as 1:2018cv00621
Plaintiff:
BETTY ASHLEY
Defendant:
RANDOLPH COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02803
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
