Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CURTIS v. CHESTNUT RESTAURANT, LLC
as 2:2024cv00985
Defendant:
CHESTNUT RESTAURANT, LLC doing business as TACO BELL
Plaintiff:
Rashid Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Geary v. Gorman et al
as 2:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Noah Geary
Defendant:
Ty Bell and Shawn Gorman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
FRONIUS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BELLE VERNON
as 2:2024cv00771
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE BELLE VERNON
Plaintiff:
MASON FRONIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
TOWNSEND v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TOWNSEND, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, FAMILY DIVISION CHILD SUPPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
