Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bey v. One 80 Place et al
as 2:2023cv06035
Plaintiff:
Azeez Sayfa-Al-Din Bey
Defendant:
One 80 Place, Hope Center and Neighborhood House Community Outreach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bey v. South Carolina Department of Social Services
as 4:2023cv03424
Plaintiff:
Nichole Harris Bey
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Constance Leaks, Melanie McMillian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bey v. Buroughs et al
as 3:2023cv01929
Plaintiff:
Malik Abdul Bey and Jeffrod Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
Adair Ford Buroughs, Joseph Biden and Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Colon et al
as 2:2019cv00941
Defendant:
Jennifer McCoy, Nina L Savas, Jobany Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Dreyah Boorae Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Turner
as 2:2017cv03002
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Michael Bey
Defendant:
Dustin E Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bey et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2017cv01006
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gerrill Toomer Bey and Tawana Michelle Toomer
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Susan M Chang, Althea Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Szymczynska et al
as 2:2016cv02530
Plaintiff:
Demeian Pinckney Bey
Defendant:
Kamila Szymczynska and Deadra Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
EL BEY v. SEYMOUR et al
as 3:2014cv02858
Plaintiff:
Sakima Iban El Bey
Defendant:
Margaret Seymour, Beattie B Ashmore and L Walter Tollison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
