Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Andr et al v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv04065
Plaintiff:
Eric Andre and Clayton English
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Kevin Roberts, Aimee Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL et al v. DEWEY et al
as 7:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HILL and VIRGIE HILL
Defendant:
MIKE DEWEY, JERRY MILLER, TERRY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS et al v. BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
SYDARIUS REYNOLDS and VERDA MAE REYNOLDS
Defendant:
BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA, MIKE SELLARS, TERRY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. BRANHAM
as 7:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
RA AMEN BEY
Defendant:
BENJI JEROME BRANHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANHAM v. MELTON et al
as 7:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
BENJI JEROME BRANHAM
Defendant:
KRISTI MELTON, SCOTT NEWBERRY, CRYSTAL PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dukes v. Bennett et al
as 1:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
Treneshia Dukes
Defendant:
Suzanne Bennett, Nicholas Deaton , Steve Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Branham et al
as 4:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
Ellison Robert Burns, Jr.
Defendant:
Carol Branham, Rosalind Brooks, Melissa Downs and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
The Illusions of the South, Inc. et al v. City of Valdosta et al
as 7:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
The Illusions of the South, Inc., The Illusions of the South, Inc., Robert Mason and others
Defendant:
City of Valdosta, Georgia, City of Valdosta, Georgia, City of Valdosta, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
