Cases 1 - 10 of 124
DeMoor v. Freeman Webb Company, Realtors et al
as 3:2024cv01111
Defendant:
Brook Gipson, Bret Harris, Freeman Webb Company, Realtors and others
Plaintiff:
Karen DeMoor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Devereaux et al
as 3:2024cv00369
Defendant:
Robert Devereaux, G. McMillan, Mike Hammond and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Claiborne County, TN et al
as 3:2024cv00295
Defendant:
Bob Brooks, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Claiborne County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Pauline Buchanan and David Davis
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Sheriff Bob Brooks, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Brooks
Defendant:
Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brooks v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
David Russell Brooks
Defendant:
Bill Lee and David Roush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
