Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thompson v. City of Van et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mary . Thompson
Defendant:
city of van, Tammy Huff, Melissa Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning et al v. Filler
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
John W. Manning and Brandi Burns
Defendant:
Frank Filler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shanks v. City of Arlington, Texas et al
as 4:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Dawnyale Shanks
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Texas, Super 8 Worldwide, Inc., Natha Hospitality Group, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Burns
as 4:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Defendant:
Michael Heath Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
