Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Drago et al
as 4:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Ryan Drago and Carlos Phillips
Defendant:
City of St. Louis and Ryan J. Drago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bhattacharya v. Southeast Missouri State University Board of Regents et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dr. Shamik Bhattacharya
Defendant:
Southeast Missouri State University Board of Regents, Dr. Carlos Vargas, Dr. Mike Godard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00926
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2020cv01243
Defendant:
Peter V. Carlos, Robert Crawford, Argyle Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Diane F. House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gaines v. KBR, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00391
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gaines
Defendant:
KBR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCain v. Kansas City Missouri et al
as 4:2011cv01221
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri , Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners, Darryl Forte and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos C McCain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCain v. City of Kansas City, Missouri et al
as 4:2011cv00450
Plaintiff:
Carlos C McCain
Defendant:
City of Kansas City Missouri, Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, James Corwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
