Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Dionne v. Del Toro
as 2:2024cv02222
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dionne
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cerrato et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
Henry Paz Cerrato, Pedro Gomez, Edgardo Flores Sequeiros and others
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Cerelyn Davis, R. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Casanova et al v. Johnson County et al
as 2:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juan Casanova, Jenny Casanova and Juan Carlos Cassanova
Defendant:
Johnson County, Edward Tester, Bradley Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaona-Martinez et al v. Martin
as 3:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gaona-Martinez and Saul Rodriguez Escobar
Defendant:
Wes Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Williams v. City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Trae Sweeten, City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Charles Faircloth
Plaintiff:
Carlos Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv02718
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Shelby County Juvenal Criminal Court Division, Dan H. Michael and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
