Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Moaf et al v. Casey et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Mohsen Moaf and Jacqueline A Moaf
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Dan Gordon, Robert Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Del Toro
as 3:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
William David Jones
Respondent:
Merit Systems Protection Board
Defendant:
Carlos del Toro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Phillips et al v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia et al
as 3:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Phillips, Mark Ehrlich, Ryan Meszaros and others
Defendant:
Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, Whittington W. Clement, Robert D. Hardie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Forrester v. Nunez
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tony Gene Forrester
Defendant:
Carlos Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
