Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GRAHAM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04291
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS, PHILA. POLICE DEPT. 39TH DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILES et al v. CHILDRENS HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
CECIL JOE MILES and MARY ELIZABETH BENITEZ
Defendant:
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL, MONONGAHELA POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHILDREN YOUTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REESE et al
as 2:2023cv00476
In Re:
DEON REESE, ERIC JEFFERSON, CECIL PINNIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. City of Williamsport et al
as 4:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Cecil Thompson
Defendant:
City of Williamsport, Lycoming County, Jason P. Bolt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HARMON et al v. MARYLAND DEPT. OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE et al
as 2:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLINTON HARMON
Defendant:
MARYLAND DEPT. OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE and THE ORPHAN'S COURT FOR CECIL COUNTY MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT v. RICHARDS et al
as 2:2012cv05734
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
CECILE RICHARDS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
