Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Charmaine Prater v. Tara Chestnut, et al
as 24-1480
Plaintiff:
OVA 467 and CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
TARA CHESTNUT, ROXANE CRAWLEY, ESQUIRE, PHILADELPHIA LEGAL ASSISTANCE and others
Tara Chestnut v. OVA/467, et al
as 23-2081
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TARA CHESTNUT
Defendant / Appellant:
OVA/467 and CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant / Appellee:
FAMILY MEMBERS, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
City of Philadelphia Revenue v. John Doe, et al
as 23-2088
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA REVENUE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellant:
OVA/467, AKA Charmaine Custis and CHARMAINE PRATER
Tara Chestnut v. OVA/467, et al
as 23-1959
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TARA CHESTNUT
Defendant / Appellant:
OVA/467 and CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant / Appellee:
FAMILY MEMBERS, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00074
Defendant:
SUPERVISOR S. DOUGHERTY, CARLEEN WYTCHE, ANTHONY DISABATO and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. COLON
as 2:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
CHARMAINE PRATER COLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PHILA HOUSING AUTHORITY v. PRATER et al
as 2:2017cv04312
Plaintiff:
PHILA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Defendant:
ELLA PRATER, ESTATE OF ELLA PRATER, CHARMAINE PRATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2017cv03203
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, CITY OF PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION COMMISSIONER, JOHN MANDROS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERRANO et al v. PRATER et al
as 2:2016cv06688
Plaintiff:
THAIS SERRANO, U.S. EASTERN DISTRICT COURT, JAMES P. MCGARRITY and others
Defendant:
CHARMAINE PRATER, RAZIZ WOODS and CHANELL PRATER-MCCOULLUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
