Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Konecny (PS) v. Big M Casino, The et al
as 1:2023cv03250
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny
Defendant:
Big M Casino, The, George Freeland, Dana Goodell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 - IDEA: Challenge Decision re: Education for Handicapped
Williams v. City of Aurora, Colorado et al
as 1:2019cv02539
Plaintiff:
Andre Williams
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Colorado, Edward Clements, Matthew Milligan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Denver Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv01587
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gomez
Defendant:
Denver Police Dept., Mathew Clements and Antonio Milo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Clements et al
as 1:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
Marshall Perez
Defendant:
Matthew Clements and City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roemer et al v. Carochi et al
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Heather Roemer and Samantha McClellan
Defendant:
Tony Carochi, Kevin Milyard, Lou Archuleta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Myers v. Hummel et al
as 1:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Bernard K. Myers
Defendant:
Dorwin Dwayne Hummel, Sally A. Myers, Sally (I) A. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ankeney et al v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
Randal Ankeney , Fred Dale , Daman Thompson and others
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deli Hue III v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2013cv03411
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Deli Hue III
Defendant:
Hickenlooper, Suthers, Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Quinn et al
as 1:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
Glenice Martinez
Defendant:
James Quinn, Peggy Heil, Tom Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
