Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MORETT CARLISLE v. RICH
as 1:2023cv01891
Plaintiff:
PEGGY DIANE MORETT CARLISLE
Defendant:
CONNOR RICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS (IPS) et al
as 1:2016cv02042
Defendant:
DIANE ARNOLD, KELLY BENTLEY, GAYLE COSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLEMAN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00386
Defendant:
ANY AND UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS WHOM NAMES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME, ASSESSOR'S OFFICE, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND/OR COMMISSIONER COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff:
WAYDE COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
OKEREKE v. CONNORS et al
as 1:2012cv00194
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS A. CONNORS, JUDGE BONNIE H. MACLEOD and JUDGE PAUL E. TROY
Plaintiff:
PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BREWINGTON v. NEGANGARD et al
as 1:2011cv01144
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BREWINGTON
Defendant:
EDWARD J. CONNOR, DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA, JOHN DOES, 1 THROUGH 25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
